Senator Claire McCaskill, who has an annual salary of nearly $200,000 US Dollars, was recently contacted about her eligibility for a free mobile phone.
Since then, Senator McCaskill has made it very public that she wishes to ban the free cell phone program, citing her own experience as proof that this program was out of control and rife with fraud opportunities.
The Lifeline Program was brought into existence by the Federal Communications Commission back during the Reagan Administration. The point of this program is to bring affordable access to telecommunications and broadband to those who otherwise could not afford it. Many consider this to be a luxury that is now being bestowed upon the poor at the expense of the taxpayers. However, these are not public tax funds that are being poured into this program. Every citizen who has a paid account for a telephone is charged a nominal monthly fee, which goes into the Universal Service Fund that then provides budgeting for the Lifeline Program.
Senator McCaskill has noted that there are billions of US dollars being poured into this free mobile phone program, and unfortunately, millions of US dollars in lost revenue due to waste and fraud in the program. With mistakes such as the one that she was privy to and free mobile phones being offered to those who do not need any financial breaks, money is not only being lost by loose eligibility criteria, but also by very lackadaisical monitoring of the system in general. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is working very hard in order to tighten the reins on the program, closing up any loopholes and reducing the amount of money being lost to waste.
Senator McCaskill joins the group of politicians and powers that be that have voiced their displeasure with the program. Arkansas Rep. Tim Griffin also recently publically denounced the Lifeline Program after several of his constituents received mobile phones for their deceased relatives. Another ridiculous oversight in this otherwise amazing program.
It is too bad that a program such as the Lifeline Program is suffering such losses. It is understandable that there are members of the public that are against this, given the amount of waste and fraud. However, to condemn the honest many for the crimes and mistakes of an ignorant few would be too harsh a punishment. The long-term gains of this program far outweigh any short-term headaches. We hope that Senator McCaskill will change her tune when she starts seeing the benefits of having this program in her state.
Return to our homepage.